Learn AI today
54 concepts — every one framed around what it does for your cost base and competitive speed. No academic explanations. No mystification. Just what it is, what it costs to ignore, and why it matters now.
54 entries
AI Agent
AgentsAn AI that doesn't just answer — it acts. An agent plans a task, calls tools, checks its own output, and iterates until done. No human in the loop for each step. The result: processes that used to take a team of people run continuously, at a fraction of the cost, at a speed no human team can match. This is not the future. This is what ships in production today.
Multi-agent system
AgentsMultiple AI agents working in parallel — one orchestrating, others executing. Where a single agent might take 10 minutes, five agents working simultaneously take 2. Cost stays the same. Speed multiplies. This is how you replace a team of analysts without hiring more — and deliver output faster than the team could.
Orchestrator
AgentsThe manager agent. It receives the goal, breaks it into tasks, dispatches subagents, and synthesises the result. In human terms: a senior analyst who directs a team. In AI terms: it costs almost nothing to run and never sleeps. One orchestrator coordinating five agents delivers the output of a ten-person team — in hours, not weeks.
Tool use
AgentsThe ability of an AI to call external functions — search the web, query a database, call an API, write a file. Without tool use, AI is a thinking machine. With it, AI is a working machine. This is what turns a language model into a system that cuts actual costs in actual workflows.
MCP — Model Context Protocol
AgentsThe open standard that connects AI to any external data source or tool — in real time. One protocol, any system. Capital IQ, Bloomberg, your ERP, your CRM, your database. The cost of integrating AI into your existing operation drops dramatically. Speed of access to your own data becomes instant. Built by Anthropic. Now the industry standard.
Agentic workflow
AgentsA process where AI plans and executes multiple steps autonomously — not just answering one question. The entire research-analyse-report cycle, run by AI without human handoffs between steps. What used to take 3 people 3 days takes one agent 30 minutes. That cost difference compounds across every workflow in your organisation.
Human-in-the-loop
AgentsA design pattern where humans review only the exceptions — not every step. Well-designed AI systems escalate to humans only for irreversible or genuinely ambiguous decisions. Everything else runs autonomously. This is how you cut headcount costs while keeping human judgement where it actually matters.
Computer use
AgentsAI that operates software interfaces directly — clicking, typing, navigating. No API needed. This unlocks automation of legacy systems that were previously impossible to automate. The cost of maintaining manual data-entry roles, reconciliation tasks, and form-filling workflows drops to near zero.
Autonomous agent
AgentsAn agent that runs a full task start-to-finish without checkpoints. The goal of every well-designed AI system: maximum autonomy with validated outputs. Autonomous agents are how you run operations at 10x the volume without 10x the people — and do it faster than any human team could.
RAG — Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Data & RAGAI grounded in your data, not its training. At query time, the system retrieves the exact documents, records, or rows it needs and reasons over them. The result: accurate answers from your proprietary data, instantly. No analyst spending hours searching. No consultant reading 200 pages. The cost of research and synthesis drops by 80–90%.
Vector embedding
Data & RAGConverting documents into mathematical representations of meaning. The reason AI can find the right contract clause, the right case study, the right financial record — without keyword matches. This makes search dramatically faster and more accurate. Less time hunting for information. More time acting on it.
Vector database
Data & RAGA database that searches by meaning, not keywords — across millions of documents in milliseconds. Analysts who spent days finding relevant precedents, reports, or records get answers in seconds. The research phase of any knowledge-intensive process collapses from hours to moments. That's a direct cost reduction.
Semantic search
Data & RAGSearch by concept, not keyword. Ask 'revenue risk' and find documents about margin compression, payer mix shifts, and billing errors — even if those words never appear in the query. This cuts the time your team spends finding information before they can act on it. Faster information access means faster decisions means faster competitive response.
Hybrid search
Data & RAGSemantic search plus keyword search, merged into one result. The most accurate retrieval method available today. In production RAG systems, hybrid search reduces missed-result errors by 30–50% versus either approach alone. Higher accuracy means fewer mistakes. Fewer mistakes means lower correction costs.
Chunking
Data & RAGSplitting documents into optimally sized pieces before indexing. Get this right and the AI retrieves exactly what it needs — no noise, no gaps. Get it wrong and outputs are inaccurate. The hidden performance lever in every RAG system. Correct chunking strategy directly reduces the cost of errors in AI-generated outputs.
Reranking
Data & RAGA second-pass scoring of retrieved documents to put the most relevant at the top. Dramatically improves output quality over raw vector search. Higher quality outputs mean fewer corrections, fewer human reviews, fewer errors reaching end-users. The quality improvement is measurable. The cost reduction is real.
Knowledge graph
Data & RAGA structured map of entities and their relationships — companies, people, contracts, products, decisions. AI agents that navigate a knowledge graph reason faster and more accurately than those working from flat documents. Complex due diligence, regulatory mapping, and competitive analysis that took weeks become hours.
Persistent memory
Data & RAGAI that remembers. Past decisions, established facts, domain knowledge — retained across sessions. An agent with memory gets faster and more accurate over time. It stops asking questions it already knows the answers to. The cost of onboarding AI to new tasks drops each time. The speed of execution increases with every session.
RAG vs fine-tuning
Data & RAGRAG retrieves your data at query time — cheap, fast, always current. Fine-tuning bakes knowledge into model weights — expensive, months-long, and obsolete the moment your data changes. For 95% of business applications, RAG is the right choice. It costs less to build, less to maintain, and delivers better results on factual tasks.
Grounding
Data & RAGEvery AI output anchored to a verifiable source. Grounded systems cite their evidence. In finance, healthcare, and legal — where a wrong number costs real money — grounding is the difference between a useful system and a liability. It eliminates the cost of hallucination-driven mistakes before they reach a decision-maker.
Context window
Data & RAGHow much text the AI can see at once — its working memory. Modern models handle 128K to 1M tokens. A 1M context window means the AI reads an entire contract library, annual report, or case history in a single pass. The time analysts spend stitching together information from multiple sources collapses to zero.
Large Language Model (LLM)
ModelsThe core engine. A model trained on vast text data that understands language, context, and reasoning. What matters for cost and speed: these models can now perform junior-to-mid specialist work across finance, law, healthcare, and strategy. The cost of that work drops by 70–90% when AI does the first pass.
Claude (Anthropic)
ModelsThe primary model powering our systems. Claude 4 (Sonnet, Opus, Haiku) leads on reasoning, instruction-following, and long-context as of 2026. A 1M token context window means Claude reads your entire document library in one call. Faster analysis, higher accuracy, lower cost per insight than any human team.
Reasoning model
ModelsA model that thinks before it answers — working through a problem step by step before producing output. Dramatically better on complex analysis, multi-step decisions, and tasks that require genuine logic. The result: AI that handles work previously reserved for senior specialists. Senior specialist cost, entry-level AI cost.
Multimodal model
ModelsAI that processes text, images, audio, and video — not just text. This means reading charts from PDFs, transcribing meeting recordings, extracting data from scanned forms. Every non-text data source in your operation — previously inaccessible to AI — becomes processable. More data, faster, at lower cost.
Model selection
ModelsUsing the right model for each task. Fast, cheap models (Claude Haiku) for classification and routing. Powerful models (Claude Sonnet/Opus) for reasoning and synthesis. A well-designed system routes intelligently — spending compute only where it's needed. This cuts AI operating costs by 40–60% versus using one model for everything.
Tokens
ModelsThe unit of AI compute — roughly 0.75 words per token. Every AI call costs tokens. Managing token usage is how you control AI operating costs at scale. A well-optimised system processes 10x the volume at the same cost as a naive implementation. Cost efficiency at AI scale is a real engineering discipline.
Temperature
ModelsThe precision dial. Low temperature = deterministic, consistent, reliable. High temperature = creative, varied. For financial analysis, compliance, and reporting — use low temperature. Consistent outputs mean predictable quality. Predictable quality means lower error rates. Lower error rates mean lower correction costs.
Hallucination
ModelsWhen AI invents plausible-sounding facts that don't exist. The biggest single cost driver in poorly-designed AI systems — wrong outputs that reach decision-makers cost real money. The solution is grounding, guardrails, and evals. Every well-built production system eliminates hallucinations before outputs are used. Non-negotiable in finance, healthcare, and legal.
Structured output
ModelsAI output constrained to a defined format — JSON, a specific schema, a standardised template. In production systems, structured output means AI results flow directly into downstream processes without manual reformatting. That eliminates an entire category of human work — and the errors that come with it.
Prompt engineering
MethodsThe craft of writing instructions that make AI reliably excellent. In 2026, great prompts combine role definition, few-shot examples, explicit output format, and chain-of-thought instruction. The difference between a mediocre and an outstanding AI system is often 80% prompt quality. Better prompts mean fewer errors, less review, lower cost per output.
System prompt
MethodsThe persistent instruction that defines what the AI is, how it behaves, and what it knows. The system prompt is where most of the engineering value in a production AI system lives. A great system prompt eliminates entire categories of error — cutting the cost of reviewing, correcting, and rerunning outputs.
Chain of thought
MethodsInstructing AI to reason step-by-step before answering. This alone improves accuracy on complex tasks by 20–40%. Higher accuracy means fewer mistakes. Fewer mistakes means lower costs. For high-stakes outputs — valuations, compliance checks, clinical decisions — chain of thought is not optional.
Few-shot prompting
MethodsShowing the AI examples of exactly what you want instead of describing it. Two to five well-chosen examples typically outperform detailed written instructions for formatting and classification tasks. Faster to build. More reliable to run. Lower cost to maintain.
Evals (evaluation)
MethodsA test suite that measures AI output quality against known-good answers. Without evals, you don't know if the system is getting better or worse. With evals, you catch regressions before they reach users — before a bad output costs a client, a deal, or a regulatory fine. The insurance policy for every production AI system.
Guardrails
MethodsValidation layers that catch bad outputs before they reach users. In finance and healthcare, one wrong number in an AI-generated report can cost more than the entire system. Guardrails check every output against source data — automatically, before delivery. The cost of errors drops to near zero. This is what makes AI safe to deploy in high-stakes environments.
Function calling
MethodsThe mechanism that lets AI trigger real actions — not just write text about them. Call an API, update a database, send a notification, fetch live data. Function calling is the bridge between AI reasoning and real-world execution. It's what turns a conversational interface into a system that actually changes things.
Streaming
MethodsDelivering AI output word-by-word as it generates, not waiting for the full response. For voice interfaces and long-form generation, streaming makes the difference between a system that feels alive and one that feels broken. Speed perception drives adoption. Higher adoption means faster ROI on every AI investment.
Agentic loop
MethodsThe core execution cycle: receive task → plan → act → observe result → decide next step → repeat. Each iteration the agent learns from what it just did. This self-correcting loop is why agents are dramatically more capable than single-turn AI calls — and why they can replace entire workflows, not just single steps.
Context compression
MethodsFitting more useful information into a limited context window by summarising, filtering, and compressing. Effective context compression directly reduces AI operating costs — fewer tokens used per task, same quality of output. At scale across thousands of daily AI calls, this is a meaningful cost saving.
When should I use AI?
StrategyWhen a process is expensive in time or people, follows a repeatable logic, and the cost of an occasional mistake is manageable. The sweet spot: knowledge work that currently requires specialists — analysis, research, drafting, review. These are the processes where AI cuts costs fastest and most dramatically.
Build vs buy
StrategyOff-the-shelf tools work for generic tasks. Custom systems are necessary when your workflow is domain-specific, your data is proprietary, or the competitive advantage is the AI capability itself. Build when the cost of a worse generic solution exceeds the cost of building the right one. That point comes sooner than most expect.
What can't AI do well (in 2026)?
StrategyPhysical tasks. Genuinely novel creative work requiring lived experience. High-stakes situational judgment in undefined environments. Authentic human relationships. The list is shrinking every six months. The correct question for any role today is not 'can AI do this?' but 'how much of this can AI do cheaper and faster than a human?'
AI-first workflow design
StrategyRedesigning a process around AI from scratch — not layering AI onto an existing process. The biggest cost savings come not from making each existing step 20% faster, but from asking: what would this workflow look like if AI did all the analytical and repetitive work from the start? The answer usually involves 70–80% fewer human hours.
The structural advantage window
StrategyThe gap between organisations cutting costs with AI today and those still exploring it is widening every week. The ones acting in 2026 accumulate operational AI learning — better prompts, better evals, better data pipelines — that cannot be bought or fast-followed. They get faster and cheaper every month. The ones waiting fall further behind every month.
Data moat
StrategyProprietary data that makes your AI more accurate and cheaper to run than a competitor's. Your historical transactions, clinical outcomes, or domain benchmarks trained into your system make it better over time. This is a compounding cost advantage. The longer you run, the more data you accumulate, the more accurate your outputs, the lower your error costs.
AI ROI
StrategyMeasured in three ways: hours saved (direct headcount cost reduction), quality improvement (fewer errors, lower correction costs), and capability unlocked (work you can now do that wasn't viable before at any cost). The third is usually the largest. AI doesn't just make the current business cheaper — it makes a better version of the business possible.
Pilot vs production
StrategyA pilot proves the concept. A production system generates the return. Most organisations get stuck at pilot — and pay the cost of that delay in every month of competitive disadvantage that follows. The difference between pilot and production is real data integration, error handling, monitoring, and iteration. We skip the pilot. We ship to production.
How long does it take to build?
ProcessFirst working version: 2 weeks. Production pilot: 6–8 weeks. That timeline means you start cutting costs within a month and have a fully operational system within two. Every week of delay is a week of paying for the expensive human process instead of the AI alternative. We move fast on purpose.
What do I need to provide?
ProcessAccess to the workflow — ideally with someone who does it today. Access to the data sources it uses. Willingness to give fast feedback on early outputs. You don't need a technical team or a budget for infrastructure. You need domain experts who can tell us when the AI output is correct and when it isn't.
Who owns the code?
ProcessYou own everything. Full source code, documentation, deployment configuration — handed over completely. No licence fees, no dependency on us to keep it running, no vendor lock-in. You should be able to hand it to any developer and have them understand it within a day. That's how we build.
How do you ensure accuracy?
ProcessThree layers: grounding (outputs anchored to retrieved source data), guardrails (second-pass validation of key facts and numbers), and evals (test suite of known-good examples run before every deployment). This is how we ship AI into finance and healthcare — environments where wrong outputs cost real money.
Data privacy
ProcessYour data stays in your infrastructure. AI model calls send only the specific context needed for each query — never bulk uploads of your entire dataset. For healthcare, legal, and financial data, on-premise or private cloud deployment with dedicated endpoints is available. You control what leaves your environment.
How does this differ from a consulting engagement?
ProcessA consulting engagement produces a recommendation. We produce a working system in production. The deliverable is not a slide deck — it's code running in your environment, cutting costs from the day it ships. The engagement ends when your team can operate it independently. Not when the report is delivered.
Talk to us